regenauer.blog

The postulate of the meteorological end of the world is the most powerful narrative of our era. Its corporatist excesses determine everyday life. Be it the expropriation spiral, the Graichen clan, the Agora energy transition, the Mercator Foundation, corrupt politics, anti-democratic processes, manipulated numbers or irrational forecasts - it is a transparent farce of the predator caste, which is based on half a century of corruption, indoctrination and corrupted science. In the “Green Economy” the only green ones are the dollar and 100 euro notes, which are shamelessly redistributed from bottom to top.

Tom-Oliver Regenauer | 20.05.2023

There is no escape. Day in and day out, a press dominated by a few agencies ventilates the story of man-made climate change, the imminent collapse of the global climate and the supposedly imminent and irreversible “ tipping points ”. On the basis of extremely controversial data, a global transformation is to be pushed beyond democratic processes. None of this is new. Interpretation elites have been painting the devil on the wall in this regard for decades. What is new, however, is the aggressiveness and intensity of the propaganda with which the issue is being whipped into the everyday lives of the population. And the increasingly drastic measures with which politicians, NGOs and philanthropists intend to implement the total decarbonization of the economy and society. The program of the approach, which has no alternative, coincides with the evidence-free scaremongering in the wake of the Corona crisis. The goal is an eco-social credit system, a “ green economy ,” which in its final form stands for nothing other than the end of self-determined, free living. "For 15-minute ghettos «.

In the 1970s, it was the fear of a new ice age that led to publications like SPIEGEL . This should threaten if, for example, the Gulf Stream dries up. This scenario is no longer heard or read about today. Because the narrative suddenly changed. Suddenly the ozone hole came into focus. But that too has since been lost in the media. Nevertheless, from then on it was “ global warming ” that people were encouraged to believe in. However, since neither one nor the other theoretical construct found its contemporary counterpart in reality, people now only speak of “ climate change ” - with this meaningless phrase, any weather phenomenon can be practically shaped into a story that fits the narrative of power.

The hair-raising inconsistencies of the official presentation of the topic are exemplified by the statements by ÖRR explainer Harald Lesch. These days he's unabashedly saying the opposite of what he said in broadcasts from 2001. A comparison of corresponding videos that the philosopher and author Gunnar Kaiser published on his channel in January 2020 illustrates the schizophrenia of the official climate narrative. And the intellectual adaptability of Lesch, who apparently simply tells what his editorial team, which is flexible in terms of time, wants to hear. Not long ago we heard from this corner of the media space that CO ₂ is not the cause, but the consequence of climate change. Today the audience is assured that it is the other way around.

Yes, the myth of the climate apocalypse is based on lies, cartelization and corruption. This becomes clear from the fact that only carbon dioxide (CO ₂ for the supposedly exponential rise in global average temperatures, the long-disenchanted “ hockey stick ) is blamed .” This, while the real temperature increase has been stagnating worldwide for a decade , as the NOAA (National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration), the US national ocean and atmospheric agency, confirmed in a dossier dated September 1, 2018. Now we put things into perspective.

Weather extremes are generally decreasing. The World Meteorological Organization confirmed in August 2021 that although more material damage is now being caused, fewer deaths are being recorded than 50 years ago. Weather is not climate. And since both are chaotic, non-linear systems, any mono-causal explanation falls short. Nevertheless, changes in solar radiation and dozens of other influencing factors are in the manipulated model calculations of the IPCC ( Intergovernmental Panel on Climate Change ). simply ignored

The actions of official bodies do not in any way comply with scientifically recognized methodology. The one-dimensional argument of the panic prophets was refuted by the Canadian scientist Prof. Dr. who died on September 24, 2022. Tim Ball at the University of Winnipeg over ten years ago. His revealing essay called “ Why _with Manufactured and How the IPCC Demonized CO ₂ Information” is still available today on his still current and informative website . In a variety of well-founded lectures and texts, Tim Ball explained how climate research is riddled with corruption and misused to pursue special interests. His conscientious work is groundbreaking in this field.

Diametrically opposed to the official narrative is the simple fact that the CO ₂ concentration in the atmosphere has been recovering from a historic low since around 1955 . At this point in time, depending on the measuring station and method, it was around 250 ppm (parts per million) to 320 ppm. If the CO ₂ concentration had ever fallen below the limit of 140 ppm – the “ red line of death ” – it would have meant the end of almost all vegetation. And with it also the human civilization, which simply could no longer have fed itself. The earth would soon look like the moon. Currently, the official carbon dioxide concentration of 418.56 ppm is still far away from the vegetation optimum, which ranges between 1000 ppm and 1400 ppm. Consequently, one should currently be more concerned about falling values ​​than an increase in the CO ₂ concentration in the atmosphere.

Of course, the corrupt scientific establishment has now managed to produce various daring studies the vegetation optimum that claim the opposite and try to reinterpret or _{the CO 2} absorption capacity of the plant world to downplay . However, even the layperson will notice that the theses of these nudging experiments are anything but conclusive and often lack any logic. They often turn accepted scientific findings on their head without any evidence. the hair-raising extent to which the measurements, data and model calculations on which the official narrative is based are manipulated and contrary findings are censored The biologist and freelance journalist Markus Fiedler recently highlighted in two detailed articles .

Furthermore, it is important to remember that human civilization is responsible for only around four percent of global annual CO ₂ emissions. The rest is of natural origin. Anyone who believes that carbon dioxide is the decisive lever for averting a supposed climate catastrophe is inevitably on the wrong track. The “green economy” proclaimed by financial elites and essentially fraudulent has very little to do with environmental and species protection or serious science.

A symbol of the unfoundedness of the narrative about the impending exodus of Homo sapiens is the fact that the widely celebrated apocalypse documentary " An Inconvenient Truth " by former US Vice President and climate change apostle Al Gore alone contains nine strikingly serious scientific errors. confirmed this A court in October 2007. Nevertheless, the contents of this documentation continue to be distributed. Graphics from it have found their way into school textbooks. And by fomenting irrational climate panic, Al Gore has become the “ first CO ₂ billionaire in history .”

The question arises: how can it be, despite all the contradictions, lies and - to paraphrase Annalena Baerbock: " 360 degree turns " - that have been described in this text so far, and that was just the tip of the iceberg, that this So caught up in the narrative of the man-made climate apocalypse? How is it possible that the controversial topic has now permeated all areas of social, economic and political life like a spreading tumor? There is not a small town that does not have a plan to meet the 17 UN Sustainable Development Goals (SDG). No extreme weather that is not monocausally attributed to climate change. There is hardly a company that has not already implemented or rolled out CO ₂ compensation models. Not to mention the number of tracking apps on the market.

The announced “energy transition” already has such extensive implications that it is difficult to do justice to the complex in the present format. You only have to enter the term into a search engine of your choice to understand the extent to which the establishment of the “green economy”, euphemistically justified by environmental protection, has already reached. There is an avalanche of propaganda rolling over civilization that is unparalleled in history. Corona seems like a triviality in comparison.

Although the federal government already admits in printed matter 18/21237 of July 23, 2020 that it is using the same propaganda, panic and intimidation methods when it comes to the climate catastrophe as in the Corona crisis. See the panic paper from the Federal Ministry of the Interior. The shock models and communication strategies for corona and heat deaths come from the same authors.

pursued by those in power The “ net zero goals ” will, in their final form , undoubtedly result in totalitarian structures that will lead to the end of individual transport, personal property and self-determined living. Into a QR code dystopia. Nevertheless, many people unreflectively support the “ Agenda 2030 ” including all its stylistic flourishes. They applaud dark green oppressors and run blindly, as if in good faith, towards their own incapacitation. A behavior that is falsely attributed to lemmings.

Young representatives of what is supposed to grotesque be the last generation cling to streets and cars in . protests So-called energy transition cooperatives are being founded all over the country. Mostly from dull local politicians, washed-up architects and urban planners who enrich themselves through appropriate subsidy packages from supranational organizations, climate foundations and tenders. Example: BürgerEnergie Bergisch Gladbach . The “ Birth Strike Movement ” has called for a “birth strike” to _{the population and thus CO 2} reduce emissions. The inhumane motto: “Better climate through fewer people”. The eugenics enthusiasts of the Anglo-American financial elite will rejoice.

The corporate oligarchy is also transforming towards “Agenda 2030”. There is a feeling of golden times when it comes to sustainability economics. See the Haniel Group , a family dynasty that has existed since 1756 and once made money from coal mines, ironworks and steamships. However, after the holding company recently made losses of almost 800 million euros (as of 2019), the management is now looking for new business areas and reforming the group of companies in order to make it an eco-company and benefit from the “green economy”. The Haniel Group is made up of the family clans of the Haniels, Beisheims (trading group Metro ) and Schmidt-Ruthenbecks .

The Schmidt-Ruthenbecks, in turn, are the founders of the Mercator Foundation , an ostensibly non-profit organization that has capital of well over 100 million euros and has locations in Berlin, Zurich, Istanbul and Beijing. in 2012 Spicy: It was the Mercator Foundation that founded the think tank and climate lobby organization Agora Energiewende and subsequently the Agora Verkehrswende , a construct riddled with corruption, cronyism and party infiltration, which was most recently caused by the most massive which showed nepotism, Graichen affair, was present in the media.

wrote about the little-known Mercator Foundation and its even more influential boss Bernhard Lorentz The news magazine Cicero in 2021:

»In the past few months, the busy foundation manager has launched two major projects. The climate economist Ottmar Edenhofer will receive 17 million euros to set up a research center for international climate policy and common goods in Berlin. And Lorentz has just poached the former Environment State Secretary Rainer Baake from German Environmental Aid to lead an agora for the energy transition with a budget of twelve million euros. In the committee, ministers, state secretaries, top officials, managers and technicians should discuss problems and progress and coordinate their actions with one another. (…) The dimensions of the (…) projects are symbolic of what Lorentz has done with the Mercator Foundation. Previously known mainly in the Ruhr area, she is now present nationwide and internationally as the new kid on the block, most recently with a celebrity-infused campaign “I want Europe”. Since Lorentz took over the management of the Mercator Foundation in 2008, annual funding has increased from ten million to 60 million euros.

The money comes from the fortune that the Duisburg Schmidt family made from the sale of their Metro shares. Lorentz makes no secret of the fact that Mercator wants to work differently than the many thousands of German foundations that are quietly doing good: "We want to change the political discourse with a mixture of projects and advocacy." His key word is the English word "advocacy." . While the foundation competition at Bosch and Bertelsmann tries to avoid any impression that they are pursuing politics themselves, Lorentz makes no secret of it. He calls his budget “social risk capital.” Lorentz has had a distinguished foundation career. It started after studying history and a job with the Green Party at the Zeit Foundation, where he learned from Theo Sommer to always have appropriate quotes from scholars ready. At Vodafone he worked, which is unusual, at the same time in the company and in the associated foundation. Then he got the chance to set up the Hertie School of Governance.«

A similar caliber: Patrick Graichen , WEF member . A corporatist who has been committed to neo-feudalist sustainability economics in politics, NGOs and business for over two decades. See his key role in the Kyoto Protocol . Graichen was managing director of Agora Energiewende from 2014 to 2021 and was also closely linked to dena ( German Energy Agency ), founded in 2000, a private GmbH with 330 employees and a turnover of almost 25 million euros, which is linked to the German state apparatus ( As of: 2019).

In the role of Agora director, Graichen announced ” at the dena colloquium a “ 1 million heat pump program on April 16, 2020 . Long before he became State Secretary in Robert Habeck's nepotism- infested department in December 2021. in view of the questionable takeover of the medium-sized heat pump manufacturer "Viessmann" by the US company Carrier Global A ministry that once again seems to be making no secret of its corrupt business practices . After his expulsion, Graichen, who was almost heroized by the Greens despite all the scandals, will now receive 232,000 euros in transition money plus 5,250 euros in pension - until the end of his days, as Business Insider reported on May 17, 2023.

Side note: It was recently rumored on the Internet that Jutta A. Dönges , who recently became CFO of UNIPER, a scandal-ridden , environmentally polluting energy company that German taxpayers had to bail out with 15 billion euros last year, is Patrick's wife Graichen is. The company denied this in a press release dated May 16, 2023. To date, it has not been possible to verify who Dönges' spouse or four children mentioned on Wikipedia are.

In addition to domestic influence, a large number of international potentates are of course also involved in the panic postulate of the meteorological end of the world. For example, the controversial British activist Roger Hallam , who has been supporting the climate activists for some time and is committed to a "fight against murdering billionaires." He is called the “ whisperer of the radical climate movement .” Furthermore, the “Last Generation” received money not only from the German state , but also from the US-based Climate Emergency Fund (CEF), which is financed by US oil magnates, and four million euros in 2022 to 39 international climate protection organizations paid out.

Despite all the associated cognitive dissonance, another key figure in the financing of climate change networks now embodies the archetype of the temperature rebels' preferred enemy image. This refers to the very rich philanthropist Hal Harvey . A lobbyist born in 1961 with excellent connections to the Rockefeller and Gates Foundations. Hal Harvey is president of the Climate Imperative Foundation , a San Francisco-based non-governmental organization with huge budgets. He is also the founder of Energy Innovation LLC, which is based in the same location , as well as various other foundations and think tanks in the USA, Europe and Asia. Be it the Agora Energiewende, the European Climate Foundation , the Climate Works Foundation or the Climate Neutrality Foundation – Harvey has a hand in everything, or is even the initiator.

ZEIT headlined an article about Harvey from June 20, 2022 with the words: “ The most powerful Green in the world .”

Based on this still quite superficial analysis of the climate narrative and the networks behind it, it becomes clear that no energy, transport or even era change with far-reaching implications can be justified on the basis of this fact, which can at least be described as controversial. There is no basis for making such drastic changes. The narrative stands on foundations of clay and is primarily driven forward by anti-democratic influence from illegitimate potentates. A city like Geneva alone is home to over 700 NGOs , which together almost 34,000 people employ . From a socio-economic perspective, it takes very little journalistic effort to prove that biosecurity doctrine, sustainability economics or the “ One Health ” agenda are about class and culture warfare from above. The key question is therefore how to take the wind out of the sails of the most powerful narrative of dominance of our era on a psychological level. Because half a century of massive indoctrination leaves structural traces.

It is an end-time cult that is much more firmly anchored in many people's fundamental worldview than the Corona narrative will ever be. Because it has been installed in the media for at least 50 years and has been continuously massaged into the self-image of postmodern coexistence ever since. Organic, eco, anti-nuclear movement, Greenpeace – you name it. The consensus of all these currents: people are the problem. The enemy. His own. An auto-aggressive, destructive starting coordinate. “Science” has long since taken on the role of clerical leaders of bygone times – and should therefore no longer be questioned. It is no coincidence that Forbes magazine had the telling headline in July 2020: “ You Must Not Do Your Own Research When It Comes To Science ” (D., “When it comes to science, you are not allowed to do your own research”).

The various collateral damages of the alleged pandemic have shown where such blind trust leads, as has the despicable warmongering of imperialist hegemonies of any ideology over the past decades. Why should one trust a predator caste that has a proven track record of constantly lying, cheating, and stealing from its subordinates? The question currently arises primarily in relation to the energy transition, which will cost some homeowners their hard-earned homes due to additional and renovation costs , negative real interest rates or new EU initiatives to expropriate residential property. The real estate market is unstable. The recession , or even a new edition of the Great Depression , is imminent. Resistance to the dark green-dogmatic transformation processes is nevertheless limited. One hopes once again that elections would change something.

But they won't. The dysfunctional modern façade democracy is based primarily on the processes of the developed by the RAND Corporation in the 1950s Delphi technique , which suggests participation even though the result is already certain in advance. for a reform - meaning strengthening - of the WHO This was shown by the vote of the German Parliament on May 12, 2023, in which all established parties voted . Regardless of the corrupt structures and invasive and evidence-free activities of this dubiously financed organization.

Whether SARS in 2002/2003, swine flu in 2009/2010, the Zika virus in 2015/2016 or Corona - it always turned out that the WHO spread unnecessary panic, published false forecasts and collaborated with the criminal pharmaceutical cartels Advantage cooperated. The overarching, globalist goals of a supranational regulatory state under the aegis of the United Nations, and thus also the “Green Economy”, are supported by all UN member states and all established parties. And others will never win majorities. Mass media, insane electoral law reforms and increasingly anti-democratic governance structures will ensure this.

A closer look at the genesis of the climate change narrative reveals a masterpiece of generational social engineering . While the control of civilization via the individual energy consumption of its systems was already a core idea of ​​the totalitarian technocracy movement of the 1930s - and with CO ₂ tracking today marks the core idea of ​​the sustainability economy and the surveillance state associated with it - the narrative takes precedence over the man-made one The apocalypse, about the finite nature of resources and the supposed overpopulation that had supposedly been imminent for decades, only really gained momentum in 1969. With the founding of the Club of Rome by David Rockefeller Sr.

The Winterthur, Switzerland-based organization run by the Anglo-American financial elite published its first alarmist report in 1972 – “ The Limits to Growth ”. Its contents have been falsified dozens of times . Nevertheless, the pamphlet, whose contents have been invalidated , is still considered a standard work and reference point for climate apocalyptists. And the “Club of Rome” naturally maintained its core statements. Despite demonstrable errors in the narrative, transparently politicized prophecies of doom and holes in the evidence. A large number of publications that looked bleakly into the future such as “ The First Global Revolution ” (1991) or the “ Planet Emergency Plan ” (2019) followed. The propaganda machine continued to run.

The mass media gratefully picked up the topic. Sex and disasters impose pressure. in particular The oil crises of the 1970s were grist for the mill of climate protection initiatives. These also marked the end of the social-liberal reform era and the beginning of the postmodern media age. The internationally networked through philanthropy and infiltration of the agency press, scientific establishment , health and education systems financial, corporate and aristocratic elites ensured that the narrative was deeply anchored in the DNA of postmodern societies . As a child in the 80s, I was already exposed to stories about human beings as a troublemaker and the pest Homo sapiens in kindergarten and primary school. Environmental and nature conservation were in vogue. And people are always the problem.

It is primarily the super-rich and elite who unscrupulously pollute the environment and exploit the planet through corrupt corporate plutocracy. See ex-Prince Charles – the prodigal – now King, or rather, Despot of Great Britain. , pedophile and rapist Jimmy Savile for decades Charles not only maintained close ties to the sex monster , it was also he who at the World Economic Forum announced the Great Reset . The heir to the throne has been promoting a new world order for decades and announced in 2009 that humanity only had 96 months left to save the planet. But the earth has apparently survived the year 2017.

The royal scion founded the organization “ Business in the Community ” in 1985, which later became the “ International Business Leaders Forum ”. Although this officially ceased its business activities in 2013, the operational tasks are continued by two organizations that emerged from it: the “ International Business Leaders Forum Global ” and the “ Partnering Initiative ”. Both are dedicated to the same goal as the anti-democratic WEF and complement its activities in terms of cementing corporatist structures at the supranational level. Always in focus – “Sustainable Development”. Sustainability economics. Redistribution from bottom to top under the pretext of climate protection. One would seriously struggle to count how many times WEF address on decarbonizing the global economy. in Charles' 2020 the term " sustainable markets " was used

In any case, it quickly becomes clear from the cloud of phrases breathed into the room that Charles is concerned with profits for the financial world and corporations, with complete control of the population and neo-feudal structures - and not with environmental protection. The author Joan M. Veon compiled relevant findings over twenty years ago for her insightful book “Prince Charles: The Sustainable Prince”. The fact that the “Green Digital Economy”, which is being rolled out worldwide and has been set up in Ukraine since at least 2019 as a pilot project by international “ Public Private Partnerships ”, is not a matter of altruism on the part of the ruling caste, is shown by the massive participation of the people dark financial power BlackRock is working to rebuild the war-torn country. A reconstruction that, contrary to all the logic of war, is being pushed forward at a rapid pace.

Of course, in addition to illustrious figures such as Habeck, Graichen, King Charles, Hal Harvey and the Rockefellers, Bill Gates , who has already earned millions from the Corona crisis and his new hobby of the food industry, is also committed to the fight against climate change. He calls for a “ green industrial revolution .” To this end, he is not only planning megalomaniacal and dangerous geoengineering projects. Gates and the Rockefeller Foundation , together arguably the most powerful philanthropy vehicle in the world, are also officially collaborating to launch a “ green revolution ” in Africa. You can see what this means, for example, by the fact that Nigeria has already introduced a digital central bank currency (CBDC), without which it would be difficult to obtain drinking water or basic foodstuffs. Ukraine wants in early 2024 to put its CBDC into use left-wing government . Just like Brazil's . As previously stated: “Green Economy” is a synonym for class struggle from above.

The “inclusive stakeholder capitalism” proclaimed with meaningless buzzwords is an illusion. The associated “ biodigital convergence ” is a transhumanistic horror scenario. Only the dollar bills that are shamelessly redistributed from bottom to top are “green”. Because power corrupts. And in this system only those who have sufficient financial resources have power. This is clearly shown by the high priests of the climate narrative at the IPCC based in Geneva (Switzerland) . First and foremost, the governance model and the formulation of the one-dimensional IPCC work order should give pause for thought. Because the task of providing evidence of man-made climate change does not sound like an open-ended research assignment, but rather like politicized government science. The fact that these concerns are not wrongly raised is already implied by the organizational structure of the IPCC. A “ top-down construct ”. A politicized management body dictates which results lower-level authorities have to develop. The IPCC does not conduct any research of its own. It consolidates existing results from selected scientists whose professional success is generally dependent on green funding.

Working groups I, II and III are made up of “ policy makers ” and consist of the IPCC Plenary, the IPCC Bureau and the Executive Committee. According to the previously mentioned Delfi technique, the upstream groups first create the alarmist SPM report (Summary for Policy Makers), which then appears prominently in all media and is intended to stir up panic. Working Group III is now working on supporting the information in the SPM report that has already been communicated to the outside world with data. For this reason, the more detailed "scientific" reports, the "Working Group Assessment" or the "Special Reports", always appear much later. And in the media you don't hear anything about these baseless, laboriously constructed fabrications . Otherwise, when comparing the timeline, it might be noticeable that graphics from the first IPCC report from 1990 still included the warm periods of the Holocene, in contrast to current diagrams.

When the leading media confidently report that 97 percent of scientists agree that the climate apocalypse is imminent, they are also referring to manipulated data and politically motivated directives from the IPCC leadership circle. In fact, only 0.54 percent of scientists who write about climate change argue that humans are the primary driver of the phenomenon. in March 2023 In contrast, there are 1,500 renowned researchers from over 30 countries who published a declaration that suggests that there is no climate emergency at all. But you don't hear about it at the UN, IPCC or in the mass media. The censorship lack of transparency has a method, as Judith Curry, President of the Climate Applications Forecast Network (CFAN), already in an editorial from September 15, 2013. explained

»What they (IPPC SPM) say: The rate of warming since 1951 has been 0.12°C per decade. What this means: in its last hugely influential report in 2007, the IPCC claimed the world was warming at 0.2°C per decade. Here they admit that the rate of global warming has declined massively - although this is hidden in a section about the recent pause in warming. Now it turns out that the actual number is not only just over half of what they had estimated - it is also below their lowest previous estimate.

The Climategate scandal in 2009 also made it clear that the IPCC is corrupt, publishes false data and has no scientific work ethic. Over 1,000 leaked emails from leading IPCC scientists confirmed that all forecasts were manipulated to benefit special interests. Excerpts of the software code used for model calculations contain text comment lines that indicate where to manually intervene to generate the manipulative hockey stick curve.

Other emails show that political influence is being exerted on the results. Especially when the temperature increase supposedly causally caused by CO ₂ on short time scales has no real correlation at all. A real conspiracy to suppress real data and findings. The lead author of the IPCC, Kevin Trenberth, wrote to his colleagues Mann, Santer, Wigley and Philip D. Jones, as well as other leading alarmists such as Stephen H. Schneider and James Hansen, that the data unfortunately does not support what the manipulated climate models in the SPM predict :

» (…) Where the hell is global warming? We're asking this here in Boulder, where over the past two days we've broken records for the coldest days on record. (…) The fact is that we cannot explain the lack of warming at the moment. And it’s a travesty that we can’t do that.”

Further e-mail excerpts from Philip D. Jones that speak clearly are as follows:

»I can't see any of these papers in the next IPCC report. K. and I will keep them out somehow – even if we have to redefine what peer-reviewed literature is!” (…) The Australians are concerned that this may represent a somewhat more conservative approach to the risks than that suggested by CSIRO (Commonwealth Scientific and Industrial Research Organization). In particular, they would like the section on fluctuations and extreme events to be beefed up if possible.

Although it has been publicly known since 2009 at the latest that the IPCC's "fear porn" researchers cannot be trusted, the results of the intergovernmental committee still form the basis of the United Nations Framework Convention on Climate Change , which was adopted in 1992 by 165 of the 198 member states Ratified by . On June 13, 2019, the United Nations also entered into a strategic partnership with the World Economic Forum to “ jointly accelerate the implementation of the 2030 Agenda for Sustainable Development .” This is supranational, totalitarian, invasive and neo-feudalist corporatism in its purest form. Because none of these organizations, decisions or agendas were democratically legitimized.

In the light of the information available, one must logically state - at least if one has not yet completely renounced logic - that no matter how one views the various interpretations of the data on climate change, as a democrat one is at least forced to admit that one is based on one Maneuvering on such thin ice, a controversial narrative determined by corrupt scientists and corrupt financial elites is not allowed to make far-reaching decisions for the entire civilization or the global economy.

A transparent, broad scientific, social and economic discourse would be necessary in order to discuss relevant factual questions on the topic of climate and to create a foundation for democratic decision-making. Any other approach must be categorically rejected. An imposed turning point based on the data or circumstances described above can only be described as a neo-feudal seizure of power. Even if the mainstream media audience, manipulated by half a century of climate propaganda, frenetically applauds their own incapacitation. They don't know any better. At least until now.

Bild: Banksy – The Tribute (by Pixels )